Lawrence Kohlberg
Moral Development


 

Carol Gilligan
Moral Reasoning & Gender

 

 

Lawrence Kohlberg
Moral Development


Lawrence Kohlberg was such an interesting character! He was born into money, yet took to sea and began pondering moral reasoning. Little else has been recorded about early Kohlberg other than his adventures as a sailor; one such example was his involvement in smuggling Jews through a British blockade in Palestine during World War II! Kohlberg is known for his theory of moral development which he built on Piaget and Dewey's theories. He believed that people progressed in their ability to reason morally through six stages, with three levels (see below for description) mostly through social interaction.

Kohlberg theorized that progression through these stages was not only due to age, but also the result of experiencing moral dilemmas. Only when a person was able to experience a dilemma would they be able to advance in their own moral development. The motivation to advance through the stages comes as a person realizes that their current strategy for coping with moral dilemmas is inadequate. When an individual struggles with this internal dilemma of not being able to adequately solve a dilemma, they experience what is called cognitive dissonance. This dissonance provides the motivation to move to a higher level of approaching and ultimately solvely moral dilemmas.

One of the drawbacks to Kohlberg's theory is that all of the research on his stages were done only with male subjects. According to Kohlberg, women "can't" reach any stage past the third one! Something else to take into consideration is that people do not always act in accord with their level of reasoning (someone who is able to reason at the postconventional levels might behave at times in terms of preconventional levels).

Summary

KEY COMPONENTS OF THEORY:

  • Morality is neither universal nor local. It is a process of thinking and it occurs in six stages:
Level Stage Description
Preconventional
1
Punishment / Obedience (motivated by fear of punishment - an eye for an eye)
2
Reciprocation (motivated by what one receives for right choices - you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours)
Conventional
3
Social Approval (motivated by what others expect in behavior - good boy, good girl)
4
Societal Maintenance Orientation (motivated by keeping of law and order)
Postconventional
5
Social Contract (laws that are wrong can be changed)
6
Universal Ethical Principle Orientation (moral responsibility to make societal changes regardless of consequences to oneself - Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, Jr.)

IMPLICATIONS FOR LEARNING:

  • Most schools label students in stages 1 and 4 (i.e. punishment and law / order).
  • Students must be responsible for their moral growth.
  • Students must hear a variety of views so that they may decide what is right and wrong.

IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING:

  • Teachers should offer more opportunities for debate about issues so students can hear a variety of perspectives.
  • View issues from a global perspective-how do other cultures look at these issues?
  • Students will begin to move into the upper stages of morality as they look beyond existing laws to decide what is right and wrong.



Carol Gilligan
Moral Reasoning & Gender


Carol Gilligan was a protégé of Lawrence Kohlberg’s, the developer of the Kohlberg Scale of Moral Development. Gilligan was troubled that females could only progress so far on the Kohlberg scale. They consistently scored lower in moral development than males. She surmised that the lower female scores were because the scale was developed from the results of a study whose participants were solely male. Gilligan believed that the Heinz Dilemma, in which a poor husband was forced to choose between stealing a drug he could not afford to save his wife or obeying the laws thus forgoing the expensive drug and sealing her fate, showed the male propensity to obey the law and the female propensity to value relationships. The scale rewarded authoritarian views (following the law) rather than authoritative beliefs (valuing relationships). Dr. Sam Snyder, the Associate Dean at the College of Education at North Carolina Stare University, suggests that males and females are not solely authoritarian or authoritative, but share elements of each belief. Middle school educators find that girls in general are more concerned about relationships while boys are more inclined to assess something based on the rules.