Jean Piaget
Cognitive Development

 

 

 

Jean Piaget
Cognitive Development


Jean Piaget is best known for his theories of cognitive development. Through his research, he illustrated that individuals learn on a continuum. First you learn through hands-on activity or concrete learning. Counting bears, counting on your fingers, cutting pizzas into pieces that demonstrate portions of the whole, learning countries’ geographic locations before you understand how their proximity affects their political alliances, are all ways to “see” and build your understanding of an idea or concept.

When new learning is introduced and you are at your most puzzled or conflicted, you are in disequilibrium. This makes sense since, as the word suggests, new learning may throw a different light on what you already know and make you unclear about what you actually do know. This is when you are the most open to learning.

Piaget believes that as you learn you build communities of information that you store. How your storage system is arranged is called the schema. Imagine it like a big coat rack in your head. The big hooks are for the big topics or concepts that you know. As you add more facts that can be categorized on one hook or another you associate the new learning with what you already know. Whole new ideas or concepts may mean that you add another hook. The more you learn and store, the fuller your hooks become. Sometimes you can see connections among the facts stored on different hooks. The ability to recognize relationships and think in terms of shared hooks gives you the power to look beyond the facts to areas that require judgments about things that are not clearly stated. This type of thinking that is not strictly one way or the other but involves speculation about “what if” is abstract thinking. Piaget believes that when we are faced with a great deal of information we can assimilate it, but for it to really become our own and fitted to a hook it must be accommodated. This explains why when we cram for a test or students are given too much work at one time, they can store it for only a short time. If they do not have the help or time to understand how it fits into the schema, it will be forgotten or lost.

It is important to understand where on the continuum of learning each person is so that the lessons are appropriate for their level of understanding. Learners must understand that they must continue to struggle to understand a concept. Just because they operate at a concrete level now does not mean that they will always be concrete. With work, they will move up the continuum. Learners should also know that just because you have reached abstract in one area doe not mean that you cannot be concrete in another area. We move in and out of concrete and abstract reasoning depending on the area of expertise and as Gardner would say the strength of the multiple intelligence we are employing.

Summary

KEY COMPONENTS OF THEORY:

  • Intellect and prior knowledge are what humans use to make sense of their world. These allow them to adapt and interact with the environment and its ever-present changes.
  • The four processes in organizing and adapting constructs are schemes assimilation accommodation equilibration.
  • People are also influenced by the knowledge they construct themselves. These are known as physical, logico-math, emotional, and social-arbitrary.

IMPLICATIONS FOR LEARNING:

  • Students can examine and study academic and social criteria through experimentation and discovery. They can access prior knowledge and experiences to increase their cognitive processes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING:

  • Teachers should provide a more stimulating and interactive classroom that would encourage learners to fuse together prior knowledge and new experiences to problem solve and develop cognitive abilities.